Print this page!  Email this page! 

PRESS BRIEFINGS

Press Briefing Friday, 6th January 2012

Shri Abhishek Singhvi addressed the media today.

Shri Abhishek Singhvi said hypocrisy of BJP is like a Himalayan peak. There is no wider hiatus between preaching and practice that you can ever find anywhere. As we have said it is imperative for Mr. Advani to immediately embark on ‘rath-yatra’. This ‘rath-yatra’, however, will be by the BJP for the BJP because Mr. Advani should know that this country does not require education about corruption. His party does. His party needs to be told the true scope of corruption. It is the most fertile ground for promoting and encouraging corrupt people. We are told this is the purificatory right which happens when allegedly corrupt get in to the BJP. It is very sad that polluters are welcomed and you are told that everybody has become pure instead of polluted. They are the savior of Judeo. Look at their forked tongue. They count the cash with Bangaru Laxman. Look at their hypocrisy. They bow out and kneel before Yeddyuruppa. Look at their preaching without practice. They support Reddy brothers till recently and the distinguished gallery which they have built up is not limited to Mr. Kushwaha alone. The distinguished gallery includes Mr. Satish, Mr. Sakshi Maharaj, Mr. Badshah Singh, and Mr. Dhananjay Singh and there are many more names. The voter has an alternative between a party which is encouraged, protected and given power & position and pelf to such people for five years the licence to loot UP. The other alternative projected before the electorate is those who welcome them on the eve of the election after giving lectures to the whole country about corruption and taking out ‘rath-yeatra’. These are the two birds with the same feather. They always flock together. Necessarily the BJP and the BSP understand each others’ culture. One practices utter hypocrisy by seeking to expel them a few weeks before election and the other welcomes them. The BJP has no need to carry a delegation to the Hon’ble President of India to shed crocodile tears on the Lokpal. The BJP should have an internal Lokpal and an internal Ombudsman which carefully scrutinizes and screens the applicants to only allow the corrupt to get through and then they should go out and give lecture to the nation. This is a very short and abbreviated synoptic view of the utter hypocrisy of this party.

On the reaction of the Congress party over the statement of Shanti Bhushan that the case of evasion of stamp duty against him is only because of the Congress party, Shri Singhvi said I think we are waiting and the whole country is waiting with bated breath for the day when anything wrong which happens in this country when the smallest leaf moves it is not ascribed to the Congress party. This univocal animosity against the Congress party tells its own tale. The silence about other parties is eloquent and sends its own message. If so much bias and animus against the Congress, such people should join the political movement and fight the congress directly. It is in the ultimate analysis very obvious to all people who have already drawn their conclusion about this biased one-sided negative and consistently critical commentary about the congress and anti-congressism as a creed which some people in this country have adopted.

To a question over the fact that Uma Bharati is going to campaign whereas earlier she had decided not to campaign in the UP elections, Shri Singhvi said this is not for me to comment who campaigns and who does not campaign. These are internal matters of their party. We have already seen on candid camera on your cameras what divide can mean between the BJP and the person you have named. You have to ask them.

On the question of giving a long rope to Mamata Banerjee, Shri Singhvi said nobody is denying that there have been differences of opinion but to suggest that such differences of opinion are irreconcilable for some quarters to try to act as ‘Naradmuni’ and to provoke and to create a provocative atmosphere is not right. The fact of the matter that we are in an alliance and we believe that there is nothing which cannot be sorted out even though sometimes time consuming by in depth talks and we have no doubt ultimately there will be a convergence.

To another question as to the release of the Punjab list of candidates and few of them are related to the leaders of the party, Shri Singhvi said I think this is the perennial asked question and every time some basics are forgotten. In a long list of different states, you will find few persons related to each other. That happens in every party in every election. The crucial point is that are they persons having a standing of their own with a winability quotient in that area. If somebody has winability quotient, he cannot and should not be denied a ticket merely for the reason he happens to be related to somebody. No party is as foolish as you might suppose to give deliberately ticket to somebody who is surely to lose thereby destroying its own chances of forming government only because that person is related to another person. Please don’t think that Congress party thinks like that because we are not imbued with suicidal tendencies.




(Tom Vadakkan)
Secretary, AICC

 

 

Sitemap              Search              Feedback

© Copyright AICC 2009 | Privacy policy. Best viewed with IE 5 + browsers at 1024 X 768 resolution.

All India Congress Committee - AICC
 

Print this page!  Email this page! 

PRESS BRIEFINGS

Press Briefing Monday, 2nd January 2012

Shri Manish Tewari addressed the media today.

Shri Manish Tewari said the last one year has been characterized by the negative politics of the BJP. The last year commenced with the opposition especially the BJP trying its best to create spectra of negativism on the 2-G issue in the country. One year later the jury is still out in the JPC whether the CAG at all had the authority to calculate the presumptive loss. Even on the Lokpal Bill, heavens would not have fallen if the BJP would have supported the Bill which was passed in the Lok Sabha. After all the same political parties, the same political formations which passed the Bill in the Lok Sabha are also present in the Rajya Sabha. All this negativism impacted the investment in the growth climate. Let us hope that 2012 ushers in an era of positive politics in this country. Opposition by the opposition for the sake of opposing does not continue to remain their only signature tune and only the swan song. Reason and sanity may prevail in the political discourse.

On the question of the reaction of the Congress party that the allies of UPA were also opposing the Lokpal Bill and that some of the allies of UPA does not have ‘Mamata’ or ‘Karuna’ with the government and why did not the UPA not talk to Mamata before introducing the Lokpal Bill, Shri Tewari said you are absolutely correct that within the UPA alliance there may be political parties which may come from different political understanding on issues and that is why you have coalition governments because different political parties come together on the basis of a common understanding to form a government. It, therefore, becomes incumbent upon everybody who is part of that coalition to try and talk to each other and resolve issues if there is a difference or gap of perception on the political understanding. We would continue to talk to TMC. We would try and allay their concerns and see that we are able to find a common approach and common ground on various issues. Insofar as the question of Mamata and Karuna is concerned, I think the last 7-1/2 years have demonstrated that notwithstanding the various prophets of doom the UPA government or the UPA alliance has not only held firm but it has delivered and it would continue to do so and fulfill the mandate which was given by the people in 2009. Shri Tewari said that I do not want to go back to 2011 but the fact is that the TMC played a positive role in getting the Lokpal Bill passed in the Lok Sabha.

On the question of the reaction of the Congress party over the fact that the Army Chief is approaching the Apex Court to resolve the issue of his DOB, Shri Tewari said the armed forces are an institution which are held in the highest esteem not only by the political establishment but by various sections of the society also. What is happening is definitely a matter of concern but I would not like to go into it and I would leave it to those who are charged with the responsibility of dealing with the issue to arrive at some kind of an opprobrious modus-vivandi.

To another question whether the Congress party feels relieved that Anna Hazare is not going to campaign against the congress candidates in the forthcoming assembly in five states in light of his falling health, Shri Tewari said in politics there is no place either for relief or worry. When you are in the fray, you place your view points before the electorate and your opponents also place their view points before the people, therefore, whenever we fight any elections, we fight the same with the best of our capabilities and having faith in our capacities. We do not mind who our opponent is.

To another question on the reaction of the Congress party on the statement of Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad of BJP on 187 amendments and why did Mr. Narayansamy speak when Shri Pranab Mujkherjee was present and that on 5th the BJP is going to petition the President of India for murder of democracy, Shri Tewari said I think this deserves a counter question. If the BJP was fine with the Bill which was passed in the Lok Sabha, as I earlier stated, heavens would not have fallen if they would have allowed the Bill to go through in Rajya Sabha. The parliament is sovereign, it has powers and it can always revisit an issue if at all inadequacies are found in a particular piece of legislation. I think the whole question was of intent. There was one stand which the BJP was taking outside the parliament and there was another stand which they were taking within. There was complete lack of consistency between their intentions and their professed action and insofar as why Mr. Narayansamy spoke and why the Prime Minister or Shri Pranab Mukherjee did not reply, I think the Congress Parliamentary Party or the UPA government does not choose its speakers on the advice or to the liking or disliking of the BJP.

On further reaction of the Congress party on the statement of the Prime Minister that after 1991 there has been a decline in the corruption and whether it may be construed that the governments led by Smt. Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi Ji were corrupt, Shri Tewari said I am not aware of the context and the reference in which the Hon’ble Prime Minister has given that statement. I do not think the Hon’ble Prime Minister had any such intentions as you are interpreting. It may have been in the context that after 1991 there was a shifting in the concentration of Indian economy from government sector to the private sector in view of the economic liberalization.




(Tom Vadakkan)
Secretary, AICC

 

 

Sitemap              Search              Feedback

© Copyright AICC 2009 | Privacy policy. Best viewed with IE 5 + browsers at 1024 X 768 resolution.